Entry 8, Analysis Pt. 3

1. Write about the rythm or tone of the text. -Analysis

2. Write about the style of writing the author uses. -Analysis

In this book is a lot of direct speech. As a result of a theatre play are a lot of acting elements in this book. Priestley used a schema. First comes the name. After that the acting part is coming. (optional) And at least, the text which is written to speak, follows.
Here an Example:
Inspector (taking back the photograph). "You recognise her?"

Sometimes the acting part is behind the speaking part.

Birling. "I will see." (He goes out quickly. Inspector turns to Mrs. Birling.)

The english is very easy to understand. Sometimes there are some words, which I didn't know but at the end of every site are some translations so it mostly is not necessary to go in the web and translate the words by your own. 
The author is using this schema the whole book long. Just at the beginning there is a description of the place and the time where this plot plays.

Words: 157

Kommentare

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

Entry 6, Analysis

Are there any words you are unsure of their meaning? Write down the words. Then write down what you think they mean, guessing from the context. Then look them up and write down a dictionary meaning. - Analysis " Enquiries of this sort, for instance." (p. 34) That could mean something like "case" or "things". Dictionary: "detailed inspections" (detaillierte Erkundungen) "Nothing but morbid curiosity" (p. 44) Perhaps something like "random" or "unexpected". Dictionary: "krankhaft" " rebuking them" (p. 45) Sounds like "interrupt" Dictionary: "jemandem einen Verweis erteilen" "But we really must stop these silly pretences ." That could mean "Behauptungen" or "Anschuldigungen" Dictionary: "Behauptungen/ Vorwand" "I have been trying to persuade Eric to go to bed, but he won't. "dazu bringen...
Mehr anzeigen

Entry 9, Reflection Pt. 2

Write about what you are learning personally as a result of reading this text.  - Reflection Personally, I like this book a lot. But I did not learned much in a direct way, rather in a other way. This plot shows me that I should hear more to their stories and be more open for other persons, as Sybil Birling should be. If she would have assumed more in the story of Eva Smith, perhaps she could have changed her opinion and at least, a dead woman could be alive. On the other hand, that I should not be so parsimonious and hard in decisions like Arthur.  When I see the situation of Sheila, then I think sometimes peoples should take the live with more humour and don't make the persons so fast some prejudices. And Eric Birling should be more carefully with his actions and should not drown his troubles in alcohol. At all, I learned to take my decisions more carefully and look more at the situation behind this peoples. Words: 156
Mehr anzeigen

Entry 4, Prediction

At any point in the story predict how some character is going to change/develop (character development) as the story progresses. How will they change? - Prediction I think the young persons changed the most through the whole plot. Expected Sheila and Eric changed the most. The reason for this is because they did the most fatal acts. Sybil did such a fatal act to, but she has also a strong will and think she did the right thing. The acts of Gerald and Arthur aren't fatal enough so that we can say Eva did the suicide because of this. All of the acts are harmonising together and that’s the reason for her suicide. Sheila was self-confident and with a strong will, but after she heard the termination of Eva's job in Milwards, she felt guilty and she seemed to be broken. Also Eric, he regretted his actions to Eva. Gerald didn't feel guilty to Eva Smith, rather to Sheila.  In opposition to the young persons, the old ones didn't regret their actions. Neither Arthur n...
Mehr anzeigen